Rights and responsibilities go hand-in-hand as they assure a proper cooperation between individuals and organizations. In every social structure, individuals are granted with certain rights on the condition that they perform their duties to this society. This is the general pattern of how these two concepts work. Being more specific, rights and responsibilities occur in every relationship. They correspond to what we get from others and what we give back. At this point, the issue of egoism is frequently involved. Egocentric individuals strive to get everything the others owe them but are not so quick to carry out their responsibilities. Surely, it disturbs the balance in human relationships because people do not receive what they are eligible for.
In a perfectly-designed society, responsibilities and rights are equal. But in a real society, they shall be regulated so that no subject cold escape from their duties. But what regulations can be imposed if we talk about moral responsibilities? They are not prescribed in any documents, nevertheless, individuals know that they are expected to contribute in a certain way. Young adults ought to take care of senior citizens, visit their senile parents, and perform other family duties. Nevertheless, people sometimes ignore rights of the others as soon as they do not need any support themselves.
Apparently, it is hardly possible to put one’s responsibilities over their rights; individuals shall keep balance between what they give and what they get. However, in some relationships (parent-child pattern) people need to carry out their duties in the first place, and over the time they will have a moral right to expect care from their children.